Anhang I Sektor 5 NIS 2

Are we a hospital under NIS 2?

NIS 2 binds you if you are a Gesundheitsdienstleister under Directive 2011/24/EU and you cross the medium-enterprise size threshold. The 30,000 vollstationäre Fälle KRITIS line is a separate, stricter German regime. Two tests, two answers.

Simon OrzelSimon Orzel·

The short version

Hospitals sit in NIS 2 Annex I sector 5 (Gesundheitswesen). The directive picks them up as 'Gesundheitsdienstleister' in the sense of Article 3(g) of Directive 2011/24/EU. The sector list is wider than hospitals on their own: EU reference laboratories, drug R&D, pharmaceutical manufacturers and makers of critical medical devices for public-health emergencies are in the same bucket.

Whether NIS 2 binds you turns on Article 2(1). You are in scope if you are a medium-sized enterprise under Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, or larger. The medium threshold is 50 employees or 10 million euros annual turnover or balance-sheet total. A 60-staff regional clinic is in. A 20-staff specialist practice is generally not.

Germany has a second regime running alongside: KRITIS. The KRITIS-Verordnung sets a hospital-specific threshold of 30,000 vollstationäre Krankenhausfälle per year. KRITIS-status hospitals are still NIS 2 entities, but they also carry stricter duties under the BSIG KRITIS sections. KRITIS is not the NIS 2 threshold. Two separate tests.

The legal source
Three layers. The directive names the sector. The directive plus the EU size recommendation set the threshold. The German transposition operationalises both, with the KRITIS-Verordnung sitting on top.

Annex I sector 5 NIS 2 Directive (2022/2555)

Gesundheitsdienstleister im Sinne des Artikels 3 Buchstabe g der Richtlinie 2011/24/EU; EU-Referenzlaboratorien im Sinne des Artikels 15 der Verordnung (EU) 2022/2371; Einrichtungen, die Forschungs- und Entwicklungstätigkeiten in Bezug auf Arzneimittel im Sinne des Artikels 1 Nummer 2 der Richtlinie 2001/83/EG ausüben; Einrichtungen, die pharmazeutische Erzeugnisse im Sinne des Abschnitts C Abteilung 21 der Statistischen Systematik der Wirtschaftszweige in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft (NACE Rev. 2) herstellen; Einrichtungen, die Medizinprodukte herstellen, die während einer Notlage im Bereich der öffentlichen Gesundheit als kritisch im Sinne des Artikels 22 der Verordnung (EU) 2022/123 eingestuft werden.

Verbatim from OJ L 333/145. Sector 5 captures five categories. A hospital is the first one. Labs, drug R&D, pharma manufacturing and critical-device manufacturers are the other four.

Article 2(1) NIS 2 + Recommendation 2003/361/EC

This Directive applies to public or private entities of a type referred to in Annex I or II which qualify as medium-sized enterprises under Article 2 of the Annex to Recommendation 2003/361/EC, or which exceed the ceilings for medium-sized enterprises provided for in paragraph 1 of that Article.

Article 2(1) is the scope rule. The 2003/361/EC size definition says medium-sized means 50 or more employees, or 10 million euros or more in annual turnover or balance-sheet total. Cross either threshold and you are in.

§28 BSIG plus KRITIS-Verordnung (Germany)

§28 BSIG transposes the Annex I scope into German law. The BSI-Kritisverordnung defines, for KRITIS purposes, the 30,000 vollstationäre Krankenhausfälle pro Jahr threshold for hospitals.

Two German rules sit on top of each other. §28 BSIG implements the NIS 2 scope test (sector plus size). The KRITIS-Verordnung adds a separate, stricter German layer for systemically important hospitals. NIS 2 scope first, KRITIS scope second.

Three tests that decide your answer
Walk these in order. If you fail the sector test, you are out. If you pass the sector test but fail the size test, you are out. If you pass both, you are in NIS 2. KRITIS is a separate question.
Test 1

Sector test

Are you a Gesundheitsdienstleister under Article 3(g) of Directive 2011/24/EU? That covers hospitals, clinics, outpatient providers, dental practices and any healthcare professional regulated by a member state. Labs, drug developers, pharma manufacturers and makers of critical medical devices are also in sector 5 under separate sub-categories.

Test 2

Size test (Article 2(1))

Do you have 50 or more employees, or 10 million euros or more in annual turnover or balance-sheet total? Either threshold puts you in scope. Below both, you stay out, with narrow exceptions in Article 2(2) and (3) (regardless-of-size overrides for sole providers, public administration, qualified trust services and a few others).

Test 3

KRITIS overlap (Germany only)

Do you reach 30,000 vollstationäre Krankenhausfälle per year? That is the threshold in the BSI-Kritisverordnung. Above it, you are KRITIS and you carry the stricter §31-32 BSIG duties on top of the regular NIS 2 duties. Below it, you are NIS 2 only. KRITIS is German-specific; NL, FR and AT use their own designation rules.

Two rules that catch most people out
Two structural points that the audience misses on first read. Both come up in almost every applicability conversation we have with hospital CIOs.

NIS 2 is not KRITIS

Two regimes, two laws, two thresholds. NIS 2 uses the EU medium-enterprise size definition (50 staff, 10 million euros). KRITIS uses sector-specific volumetric thresholds (for hospitals: 30,000 vollstationäre Fälle). Most hospitals that are in NIS 2 are not in KRITIS. The reverse is not possible: every KRITIS hospital is also a NIS 2 entity.

Sector 5 is broader than hospitals

Annex I sector 5 captures five categories in one bucket: healthcare providers, EU reference laboratories, drug R&D entities, pharmaceutical manufacturers and critical medical-device manufacturers. A 60-person diagnostic lab serving hospitals is in sector 5 in its own right, not as a supplier. Same size test, same duties.

How national regulators actually run this
The EU sets one scope rule. Each member state lifts it into national law and publishes sector-specific guidance. The substance is the same across the Union; the mechanics differ slightly.
Germany

BSI / §28 BSIG plus KRITIS-Verordnung

The BSI publishes sector-specific FAQ material for healthcare under the NIS2-Umsetzungsgesetz and runs the KRITIS designation process separately. §28 BSIG is the NIS 2 scope hook. The BSI-Kritisverordnung sets the 30,000-Fälle KRITIS threshold. Both can apply to the same hospital.

EU-wide

ENISA NIS 2 transposition tracker

ENISA publishes a NIS 2 transposition page that lists the national laws and competent authorities per member state. It is the cleanest single source for cross-border hospital groups working out which regulator they file with in each country.

Other member states

National transposition laws

Annex I sector 5 binds healthcare providers across the EU. NL covers it through the Cyberbeveiligingswet; FR through Ordonnance n° 2024-1093; AT through the NISG. The sector test is the same. The size test is the same. Reporting channels and competent authorities differ.

Three traps we see all the time
Three reads that show up in almost every applicability call with a hospital CIO or managing director. All three lead to wrong scoping decisions.
  • We are under 30,000 cases a year, so we are out.

    That is the KRITIS threshold, not the NIS 2 threshold. NIS 2 uses Article 2(1): 50 employees or 10 million euros turnover. A 60-staff regional clinic with 8,000 cases a year is in NIS 2 and out of KRITIS. Both can be true at once.

  • NIS 2 only applies to the IT systems, not the rest of the hospital.

    Scope works at the entity level, not the system level. If your hospital is a NIS 2 entity, every system that supports the Annex I service (patient records, ward systems, medical devices on the network, supplier-facing systems) is inside the §30 BSIG duties. There is no clinical-systems-only carve-out.

  • The pharmacy on site is out of scope.

    Depends on the legal entity and its size. If the pharmacy is a separate legal entity, it runs its own NIS 2 test. If it is part of the hospital, it inherits the hospital's NIS 2 scope. Pharmaceutical manufacturers (a separate sector 5 sub-category) run their own size test.

How real hospital operators do this

Typical case: a 50-bed regional clinic with 60 staff and 12 million euros annual turnover. Sector test passes (Gesundheitsdienstleister). Size test passes (above both medium-enterprise thresholds). KRITIS test fails (well under 30,000 vollstationäre Fälle). Result: in NIS 2, out of KRITIS. Full §30 BSIG measures apply, plus §32 BSIG incident reporting. No KRITIS audit cycle.

What practitioners actually do: run the sector test first, the size test second, document both in a written Anwendbarkeitsprüfung signed by the management body. The KRITIS question gets its own document because it triggers a different process at the BSI. Splitting them keeps the audit trail clean.

How we handle this on the platform

The applicability check walks all three tests in order: sector classification under Annex I, size threshold under Article 2(1), and the German KRITIS overlap under the BSI-Kritisverordnung. You answer six questions and get a written Anwendbarkeitsprüfung you can hand to your auditor.

The output is not a yes/no. It is a justification: which sector and which sub-category you fall under, which size test you cleared, and whether the KRITIS threshold is in play. Signed by the management body, stored with audit trail, version-pinned to the EU and BSIG text we cite.

Sources
  • Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS 2), Annex I sector 5 and Article 2(1) — eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2555/oj
  • Directive 2011/24/EU, Article 3(g) (definition of Gesundheitsdienstleister) — eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/24/oj
  • Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, Annex Article 2 (medium-enterprise definition)
  • BSI Act (BSIG), §28 as amended by the NIS2-Umsetzungsgesetz
  • BSI-Kritisverordnung, sector hospitals threshold (30,000 vollstationäre Krankenhausfälle pro Jahr)
  • ENISA NIS 2 transposition tracker — enisa.europa.eu/topics/nis-directive
Run the applicability check for your hospital
Sector test, size test and KRITIS overlap in one walkthrough. Output is a signed Anwendbarkeitsprüfung you can file. Free, open source, no lock-in.